Communication for social issues

I’m not convinced that many ads designed to address social issues, specifically the perpetrators of damaging or wrong behaviour, have any effect at all on the people they are intended for and contribute meaningfully to anything besides an agency awards cabinet with a subsequent contribution to creative rankings.


There seems to be a common thread in communication that addresses (anti) social behaviour- they end up being conceptual portrayals of serious issues or disorders that acutely lack the psychological insight and education necessary to know how to connect meaningfully with the people the communication is targeted at. 

I am also slightly doubtful that many people who demonstrate serious anti social behaviour or who do things that are damaging to themselves and/or other people are able to look at their own situation objectively, let alone through the gaze of a privileged, conceptual ad-person. Generally, people tend to be in denial about a serious problem they have or behaviour they perpetrate, so providing them with some abstract visual about the effects of their behaviour seems rather inadequate.


To me, it’s like asking a person with anorexia to look in the mirror as a means to shock them into eating. Any person remotely informed about this disorder will understand that the mirror merely reflects individual perception- an outcome guaranteed to differ for people with the disorder and those without it.


These ads done by Lowe Bull, Cape Town, for SANCA are an example. The conceptual nature of this work would suggest a fairly sophisticated target audience. In this case, I somehow doubt that using examples of extreme situations like drug abuse and prostitution to dramatise the effects of drinking during pregnancy will necessarily resonate with the apparent target audience. I’d propose that for a middle class mum-to-be, learning disabilities may have been a more realistic and appropriate example of the effects of moderate drinking during pregnancy. However, if the communication is aimed at heavy drinkers or people who abuse alcohol, i.e. those that are most at risk of having babies with Foetal Alcohol Syndrome, I’d suggest a visit to areas and communities where alcohol abuse and FAS are rife. I suspect one might find that the shock tactics of these ads, coupled with their conceptual nature are completely meaningless.


I really feel that it’s time advertising agencies took more responsibility for what they do by taking time to understand who they are speaking to, what behaviour they are attempting to change and the realistic process required to attempt to change that behaviour.